The Impact of Extraordinary Inflation Expectations on Inflation in the Iranian Economy: A Quantile Regression Approach

Document Type : Scientific-research

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of economics, Qom University Senior Researcher, Department of Commerce, Office of Economic Studies, Research Center, Islamic Consultative Assembly

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Qom,

3 Researcher of Majlis Research Center

Abstract


It is not possible to manage the inflation rate without recognizing the factors affecting it, including how the expected inflation is formed. It is not possible to manage the inflation rate without recognizing the factors affecting it, including how the expected inflation is formed. For this purpose, the annual data of inflation rate, production gap and expected inflation simulation during the years 1357 to 1395 have been used.
Based on the model estimation results, in the lower quantities of the inflation rate, the expected inflation using the past inflation rate is statistically more significant and the higher the inflation rate, the better the modeling using the past inflation trend gives better results. In the Iranian economy, which is associated with high levels of inflation, the formation of inflation expectations of economic agents is more compatible with the past inflation trend. Therefore, in order to reduce inflation expectations and achieve low levels of inflation in consecutive years, it is much more important to pay attention to the past inflation trend than the previous inflation rate.

Keywords


تشکینی، احمد، و مسعودی، زهره (1384)؛ تحلیل تجربی تورم در اقتصاد ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های بازرگانی، 36 (9)، صص 105-75.
حسینی، صفدر و شکوهی، مریم (1394)؛ بررسی عوامل مؤثر تورم با تأکید بر نقش انتظارات گذشته‌نگر و آینده‌نگر. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی، 15(1)، صص 228-209.
رحمانی، تیمور، و امیری، حسین (1389)؛ منحنی فیلیپس کینزین‌های جدید و بررسی تجربی آن در ایران. فصلنامه تحقیقات اقتصادی 47 (1)، صص 112-91.
سهیلی، کیومرث، و الماسی، مجتبی (1391)؛ ارزیابی اثر تورم انتظاری، رشد نقدینگی، تورم وارداتی، شکاف تولید و نرخ ارز بر نرخ تورم ایران. پژوهش‌نامه اقتصاد کلان، 13(7)، صص 60-39.
صادقی، سید کمال و همکاران (1389)، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تورم با تأکید بر اندازه دولت. فصلنامه مدل‌سازی اقتصادی. 4 (11)، صص 91-73.
صمدی، علی و اوجی مهر، سکینه (1394)؛ بررسی پایداری و سکون تورم در ایران: مقایسه دو الگوی چسبندگی قیمت هایبرید و چسبندگی اطلاعات. فصلنامه تحقیقات مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، 19، صص 72- 41.
فرزین‌وش، اسد ا..., رحمانی، تیمور. (1379). درون‌زایی عرضه پول و تأثیر فشارهای هزینه‌ای بر آن در اقتصاد ایران. تحقیقات اقتصادی، (1)35، ص 7.
نصر اصفهانی، رضا، و یاوری، کاظم (1382)؛ عوامل مؤثر بر تورم ایران - رهیافت خود رگرسیون برداری. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، 16، صص 99-69.
Boswijk, H., Hommes, C., & Manzan, S. (2007); Behavioral heterogeneity in stock prices.Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control (31), 1938-1970.
Branch, A. (2004); The theory of rational heterogeneous expectations: evidence from survey data on inflation and expectations. Economic Journal, 114(1), 592-621.
Brock & Cars H. Hommes, 1997. "A Rational Route to Randomness," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1059-1096, September.
Chorteas, G. Magonis & Panagiotidis, T. (2012). “The Asymmetry of the New Keynesian Phillips Curve in the Euro Area”. Economic Letters, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp 161-163.
Friedman, M(1968); The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 58, 1-17.
Gali E, & Gertler, M. et all. (2005); Robustness of Hybrid New Keynsean Philips Curve. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 52, No. 6. 1107-1118.
Gramlich, Edward. (1983); Model of inflation expectations formation: a comparison of household and economist forecasts. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 15(2), 73-155.
Heemeier, p., Hommes, C., Sonneman, J., & Tuinstra, J. (2009); Price stability and volatility in market with positive and negative expectations feedback: an experimental investigation. Journal of Economics and Control (33), 1052-1072.
Hommes, H. (2005); Heterogeneous expectation hypothesis: some evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(1), 1-24.
Jean-Baptiste, F. (2012). “Forecasting with the New Keynesian Phillips Curve: Evidence from Survey Data”. Economic Letters, Vol. 117, No. 3, pp. 811-813.
Kahneman, D. (2003); Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-1475.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1986); Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251-278.
Koenker, R. & Basset. (1978); “Quantile Regression”. Econometrica, 46, 33-50.
Leu, S , (2011) ;a New Keyneseian SVAR Model of the Australian Economy”. Economic Modelling 28, 157-168.
Lee, j. Dong, Yoonb, H. Jai. (2016). ” The New Keynesian Phillips Curve in multiple quantiles and the asymmetry of monetary policy “. Economic Modelling, Vol 55, PP 102–114.
Mankiw, N.G., & R, Reis. (2007); Sticky information in general equilibrium. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(3), 603-613.
Olivier Armantier & Giorgio Topa & Wilbert Van der Klaauw & Basit Zafar, (2013). "Introducing the FRBNY Survey of Consumer Expectations: Measuring Price Inflation Expectations," Liberty Street Economics 20131204a, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Pesaran, H., & Weal, M. (2006); Survey expectation. CESIFO Working Paper159, CESifo Group Munich.
Robert E. Lucas, Thomas J. Sargent (Eds.) , Rational Expectations and Econometric Practice, University of Minnesota Press (1981), pp. 229-260.
Simon, Herbert. (1955); A behavioral model of rational choice. the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
Tuinstra, J,. & Wagner, R. (2007); On learning equilibrium. Economic The Theory, 30(3), 493-513.
Wimanda, Rizki E.,Turner, P. M., & Hall, M. B. (2010). “Expectations and the inertia of inflation: the case of Indonesia”. Journal of Policy Modeling.
Wolter, S,C. (1993); The use of survey results in respect to autoregressive expectation formation.Paper Presented at the 21st CIRET Conference, Stellenbosch, 53-55.